Property Rights vs. Heritage
Every few months I find myself in a preservation discussion on Facebook. My points usually fall on deaf ears so I don’t engage too long, but today’s argument brought me back to my response a few years ago.
I was arguing how a house should be saved instead of being torn down for the construction of two houses, and this comment was posted:
“I wish some people could be more chill with the old house preservation/renovation. People spent money to buy the property, developer or not, why should somebody else who spend no dime in renovation intervene what they want to do with the place. Second, just zoom out of the town, and look in a slightly bigger perspective, some of the houses they are trying to "save" are really nothing special.”
My response:
I understand that you have a perspective on the preservation and renovation of old houses, and I appreciate your viewpoint. It seems that you believe that individuals who have purchased a property should have the freedom to do as they wish with it, without interference from others who have not invested in its renovation. Additionally, you mention that some of the houses being "saved" may not be particularly unique or significant in a broader context.
Preservation and renovation debates often involve a clash between different values and priorities. While it is true that property owners have rights to make decisions about their own properties, there are also broader considerations at play. Here are a few points to consider:
Historical and cultural value: Some old houses possess historical or cultural significance that extends beyond their individual owners. They might be representative of a particular architectural style, era, or cultural heritage that could be lost if they are demolished or extensively altered. Preserving such houses can contribute to the overall character and identity of a community.
Neighborhood character: The preservation of old houses can help maintain the charm and distinctiveness of a neighborhood. These houses often contribute to a sense of place and community pride. Their preservation can enhance the overall aesthetic appeal and cultural value of an area, attracting visitors, fostering local businesses, and even increasing property values.
Sustainability and environmental impact: Renovating and repurposing existing structures can be more environmentally sustainable compared to demolishing and rebuilding. Preserving old houses reduces the demand for new construction materials and minimizes the environmental impact associated with demolition and disposal of waste.
Community involvement: Preservation efforts often involve community organizations, activists, and experts who are passionate about the architectural heritage of a place. They invest their time, resources, and expertise to advocate for the preservation of these houses. Their goal is to foster a sense of collective responsibility for preserving the past and shaping the future of a community.
While some houses may not appear remarkable on the surface, their significance can lie in their contribution to a collective history or in the stories they hold. Striking a balance between individual property rights and broader community interests is often a complex and ongoing conversation. It's essential to engage in respectful discussions and consider multiple perspectives to ensure the best outcomes for both individuals and communities as a whole.
Bottom line, if you don’t want an old house, don’t buy an old house. Developers tearing down houses to build new are the scourge of Long Island. I will do all I can to preserve history and craftmanship and continue to fight for less demolition and more preservation. I will talk to every brick wall until I break through.
